Peer Review

Peer review assists editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communications with authors can also assist authors in promoting papers.

Article manuscripts submitted online to SAHID BUSINESS JOURNAL will be examined by the editorial board regarding scope, in-house style, plagiarism. Manuscripts that meet the requirements of SAHID BUSINESS JOURNAL will proceed to the review process which will at least be reviewed by reviewers with a double blind commitment. Reviewers are journal partners of experts with an interest in the journal field. The editor will send an e-mail to the selected reviewer regarding the title and contents of the manuscript, as well as an invitation to log into the journal's website to complete the review process. Reviewers log into the journal's website to agree to review, download manuscripts, post comments, and provide recommendations. The review process by the reviewer is carried out at least in two weeks. The results will be returned to the author for further action. Eligible papers will be published in Indonesian or English.


Any selected author who feels unqualified to review research reported in a manuscript or knows that immediate correction is not possible should notify the editor and conclude himself or herself from the review process.


Every manuscript received for review is treated as a confidential document, not shown or discussed with others unless the editor allows it.

Objectivity Standards

Reviews   are carried out objectively. Reviewers express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgments Source

Reviewers identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the author. Any statement that the statement, derivation, or argument has been previously reported must be accompanied by a relevant citation. The reviewer calls the editor's attention to any substantial similarities or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and other published papers.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review are kept confidential and not used for personal gain. The reviewer will act objectively and not engage in any conflict of interest whether it concerns a competitive, collaborative, or other relationship or connection with the author, company, or any institution related to the paper.

In the event that an editor co-publishes an article in this journal, it will be treated strictly with a rigorous and transparent review to minimize bias by asking another partner editor to handle the review procedure independently. The editor sends the reviewed article anonymously to uphold objectivity (Committee On Publication Ethics Case Number 05-22)